Publishing rules
Official
Developer, game website, Steam store or developer-authored update
Observed
Readable in official media but not reproduced in our own save
Planned
Developer intention with no shipped date
What we will not do
We do not manufacture a full tier list because the keyword exists. We do not turn a community guess into a mechanic. We do not call a marketing screenshot a benchmark, or a developer plan a feature.
Screenshots on this site come from the official Steam media set and are used for commentary, identification and instruction with source credit. Pax Autocratica and its artwork belong to Multiverse. This site is independent and unaffiliated.
Correction protocol
- 01
Name the claim
A correction should identify the page and exact statement, not just say “wrong.”
- 02
Bring a version
Early Access changes quickly. Include the patch date, screenshot or official note.
- 03
Update the evidence label
When a planned feature ships or an observed value is reproduced, its label changes and the page date moves.
Claim-level sourcing method
- 01
Attach the strongest source to the narrowest claim
A store listing supports current platform and feature labels; an official patch note supports the named patch change; official video supports visible context, not hidden values.
- 02
Keep source classes separate
Community reviews and independent videos can surface a question worth checking. They are not first-party evidence and do not become mechanism proof by repetition.
- 03
Say what the source cannot establish
Where a patch omits a number, an ETA, a crossplay detail or a performance threshold, the page labels it unknown rather than filling the gap.
Review snapshots, freshness and corrections
Steam review totals are recorded as a dated all-language snapshot with the displayed positive and negative counts. A percentage calculated from that snapshot describes the moment it was checked, not a quality verdict, forecast, or substitute for reading current buyer concerns.
Material factual expansions move a page’s checked date. A correction should replace or qualify the exact claim, name the newer source and preserve the distinction between shipped, observed and planned. Unverified reports stay signals until a stronger source supports them.
Where these claims came from
Sources support the specific claims above; community posts are never silently upgraded into official facts.